Current:Home > ScamsDonald Trump Sues Facebook, YouTube And Twitter For Alleged Censorship -DataFinance
Donald Trump Sues Facebook, YouTube And Twitter For Alleged Censorship
View
Date:2025-04-16 00:29:46
Former President Donald Trump is suing Facebook, Twitter and Google's YouTube over their suspensions of his accounts after a mob of his supporters attacked the U.S. Capitol in January.
Trump filed class action complaints in federal court in Florida, alleging the tech giants are censoring him and other conservatives — a long-running complaint on the right for which there is little evidence and that the companies deny.
The suits call for the court "to order an immediate halt to social media companies' illegal, shameful censorship of the American people," Trump said at a news conference at his golf club in Bedminster, N.J. "We're demanding an end to the shadow banning, a stop to the silencing and a stop to the blacklisting, banishing and canceling that you know so well."
The long-shot legal actions are the latest escalation in Trump's long-running feud with the social media platforms that he used prolifically before and during his presidency.
After the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, the companies kicked Trump off their platforms, citing the risk of further violence. Twitter banned Trump permanently, Facebook has suspended him for two years and YouTube has said it will let him return only "when we determine that the risk of violence has decreased."
In Tuesday's lawsuits, the former president accuses the companies of violating his First Amendment rights and of behaving like "state actors" rather than private companies in putting restrictions on what people can post.
He has asked the court to order the companies to reinstate him and other members of the proposed class of plaintiffs.
He also wants the court to declare a federal law, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, unconstitutional. That 1996 law says online sites largely are not legally responsible for what their users post. While in office, in retaliation for Twitter's fact-checking of his tweets, Trump signed an executive order attempting to strip social media companies of Section 230 protection. (President Biden has revoked the order.)
In addition to the companies, the lawsuits name Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Google CEO Sundar Pichai as defendants, although not YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki.
Spokespeople for Facebook and Twitter declined to comment. YouTube and Google did not respond to a request for comment.
Legal experts say Trump's lawsuits are likely doomed from the start because of the strong protections that both Section 230 and the First Amendment give the companies to decide what speech they allow.
"Trump has the First Amendment argument exactly wrong," said Paul Barrett, an adjunct law professor and deputy director at New York University's Center for Business and Human Rights. He described the lawsuits as "DOA," or dead on arrival, because the First Amendment applies to government restrictions on speech, not the actions of private companies.
Even conservative experts voiced skepticism about Trump's legal case.
"These social media platforms are private property, not the government town square, and are well within their First Amendment rights to refuse to carry speech of third parties. This principle holds even with the former president of the United States and is the constitutional right of every citizen," said Jessica Melugin at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. "This lawsuit is a publicity stunt intended for political gain, not a serious legal argument."
Previous attempts to sue the platforms over their content-moderation decisions have been quickly tossed by courts. Last week, a federal judge blocked a new Florida law from taking effect. It would have fined large social media companies if they banned politicians. The court said the law likely violated the First Amendment.
Section 230 has come under broader scrutiny from both Republicans and Democrats in recent years, with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle saying its liability protections should be pared back. However, they are divided on what reform would look like, with Republicans focusing their criticisms on alleged censorship and Democrats seeking to hold the companies more responsible for misinformation and other harmful content.
Editor's note: Facebook and Google are among NPR's financial supporters.
veryGood! (754)
Related
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Jason Aldean says he stands by controversial Try That in a Small Town: I know what the intentions were
- Large carnivore ecologist Dr. Rae Wynn-Grant talks black bears and gummy bears
- Bob Knight: 'He never really let the world see the good side.' But it was there.
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Gunmen kill 5 people in an apparent dispute over fuel theft in central Mexico, police say
- What time does daylight saving time end? What is it? When to 'fall back' this weekend
- Israeli rescuers release aftermath video of Hamas attack on music festival, adding chilling details
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- A nonbinary marathoner's fight to change anti-doping policy
Ranking
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- The hostage situation at Hamburg Airport ends with a man in custody and 4-year-old daughter safe
- Victims of abusive Native American boarding schools to share experiences in Montana
- A woman and 3 children are killed by an Israeli airstrike in south Lebanon, local officials say
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Federal judge's ruling puts billions at stake for NCAA
- Turkey’s main opposition party elects Ozgur Ozel as new leader
- Spanish league slams racist abuse targeting Vinícius Júnior during ‘clasico’ at Barcelona
Recommendation
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
A Norway spruce from West Virginia is headed to the US Capitol to be this year’s Christmas tree
Judge dismisses challenge to New Hampshire’s provisional voting law
Nepal earthquake kills more than 150 people after houses collapse
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Families of Israel hostages fear the world will forget. So they’re traveling to be living reminders
This winning coach is worth the wait for USWNT, even if it puts Paris Olympics at risk
Nepal earthquake kills more than 150 people after houses collapse