Current:Home > MarketsJudge in Texas orders pause on Biden program that offers legal status to spouses of US citizens -DataFinance
Judge in Texas orders pause on Biden program that offers legal status to spouses of US citizens
View
Date:2025-04-14 23:39:00
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge in Texas on Monday ordered a temporary pause on the Biden administration’s new protections that would allow immigrant spouses of U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The administrative stay issued by U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker comes after 16 states, led by Republican attorneys general, challenged the program Friday in a lawsuit that claimed the policy would encourage illegal immigration.
One of the states leading the challenge is Texas, which in the lawsuit claimed the state has had to pay tens of millions of dollars annually from health care to law enforcement because of immigrants living in the state without legal status.
President Joe Biden announced the program in June. The pause comes one week after DHS began accepting applications.
The order puts the program on hold for at least two weeks while the challenge continues.
“The claims are substantial and warrant closer consideration than the court has been able to afford to date,” Barker wrote.
The policy offers spouses of U.S. citizens without legal status, who meet certain criteria, a path to citizenship by applying for a green card and staying in the U.S. while undergoing the process. Traditionally, the process could include a years-long wait outside of the U.S., causing what advocates equate to “family separation.”
The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately return an email seeking comment on the order.
Several families were notified of the receipt of their applications, according to attorneys advocating for eligible families who filed a motion to intervene earlier Monday.
“Texas should not be able to decide the fate of hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens and their immigrant spouses without confronting their reality,” Karen Tumlin, the founder and director of Justice Action Center, said during the press conference before the order was issued.
The coalition of states accused the administration of bypassing Congress for “blatant political purposes.”
The program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
If approved, applicants have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (2423)
Related
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Warming Trends: How Hairdressers Are Mobilizing to Counter Climate Change, Plus Polar Bears in Greenland and the ‘Sounds of the Ocean’
- At Global Energy Conference, Oil and Gas Industry Leaders Argue For Fossil Fuels’ Future in the Energy Transition
- City and State Officials Continue Searching for the Cause of Last Week’s E. Coli Contamination of Baltimore’s Water
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Rural grocery stores are dying. Here's how some small towns are trying to save them
- Consumer safety regulators adopt new rules to prevent dresser tip-overs
- Warming Trends: Laughing About Climate Change, Fighting With Water and Investigating the Health Impacts of Fracking
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- A Legal Pot Problem That’s Now Plaguing the Streets of America: Plastic Litter
Ranking
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Championing Its Heritage, Canada Inches Toward Its Goal of Planting 2 Billion Trees
- Airbnb let its workers live and work anywhere. Spoiler: They're loving it
- Why Chris Evans Deactivated His Social Media Accounts
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Inside Clean Energy: Taking Stock of the Energy Storage Boom Happening Right Now
- The dark side of the influencer industry
- Inside Clean Energy: Electric Vehicles Are Having a Banner Year. Here Are the Numbers
Recommendation
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
'Let's Get It On' ... in court
Bud Light sales dip after trans promotion, but such boycotts are often short-lived
Supreme Court looks at whether Medicare and Medicaid were overbilled under fraud law
Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
California Considers ‘Carbon Farming’ As a Potential Climate Solution. Ardent Proponents, and Skeptics, Abound
Amazon Reviewers Keep Coming Back to Shop These Cute, Comfy & On-Sale Summer Pants
North Carolina’s Bet on Biomass Energy Is Faltering, With Energy Targets Unmet and Concerns About Environmental Justice