Current:Home > StocksTrump’s EPA Starts Process for Replacing Clean Power Plan -DataFinance
Trump’s EPA Starts Process for Replacing Clean Power Plan
View
Date:2025-04-15 05:07:37
The Environmental Protection Agency said Monday it will ask the public for input on how to replace the Clean Power Plan, the Obama administration’s key regulation aimed at cutting greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.
The main effect may be to leave the Obama rule in limbo. The Clean Power Plan was put on hold by the Supreme Court pending litigation that was under way before Donald Trump took office on a promise to undo it.
In an “advanced notice of proposed rulemaking”—a first step in the long process of crafting regulation—the EPA said it is “soliciting information on the proper and respective roles of the state and federal governments” in setting emissions limits on greenhouse gases.
In October, the agency took the first step toward repealing the rule altogether, but that has raised the prospect of yet more legal challenges and prompted debate within the administration over how, exactly, to fulfill its obligation to regulate greenhouse gases.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the agency is required to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in some fashion because of the “endangerment finding,” a 2009 ruling that called carbon dioxide a threat to public health and forms the basis of the Clean Power Plan and other greenhouse gas regulations.
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has said he wants to repeal the Obama plan, but it’s clear the agency is also weighing replacement options—options that would weaken regulations. The Clean Power Plan allows states to design their own strategies for cutting emissions, but Monday’s notice signals that the Trump EPA believes states have “considerable flexibility” in implementing emissions-cutting plans and, in some cases, can make them less stringent.
In any case, the latest notice suggests an attempt to “slow-walk” any new regulation.
“Though the law says EPA must move forward to curb the carbon pollution that is fueling climate change, the agency is stubbornly marching backwards,” Earthjustice President Trip Van Noppen said in a statement. “Even as EPA actively works towards finalizing its misguided October proposal to repeal the Clean Power Plan, EPA today indicates it may not put anything at all in the Plan’s place—or may delay for years and issue a do-nothing substitute that won’t make meaningful cuts in the carbon pollution that’s driving dangerous climate change.”
The goal of the Clean Power Plan is to cut carbon dioxide emissions from power plants 32 percent below 2005 levels, a target that is central to the United States’ commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
Twenty-eights states have challenged the regulation, which is now stalled in federal appeals court.
“They should be strengthening, not killing, this commonsense strategy to curb the power plant carbon pollution fueling dangerous climate change,” David Doniger, director of the climate and clean air program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said in a statement. “A weaker replacement of the Clean Power Plan is a non-starter. Americans—who depend on EPA to protect their health and climate—deserve real solutions, not scams.”
In an emailed statement Monday, Pruitt noted that the agency is already reviewing what he called the “questionable legal basis” of the Obama administration’s plan. “Today’s move ensures adequate and early opportunity for public comment from all stakeholders about next steps the agency might take to limit greenhouse gases from stationary sources, in a way that properly stays within the law and the bounds of the authority provide to EPA by Congress.”
veryGood! (3)
Related
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Who will be the No. 1 pick of the 2024 NFL draft? Who's on the clock first? What to know.
- We Promise Checking Out Victoria Beckham's Style Evolution Is What You Really, Really Want
- Catholic officials in Brooklyn agree to an independent oversight of clergy sex abuse allegations
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Breaking Down JoJo Siwa and Lil Tay’s Feud
- How 'Little House on the Prairie' star Melissa Gilbert shaped a generation of women
- Texas man accused of impersonating cop after reports say he tried to pull over deputies
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Lakers lock up No. 7 seed with play-in tournament win over Pelicans, setting up rematch with Nuggets
Ranking
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- How Ukraine aid views are shaped by Cold War memories, partisanship…and Donald Trump — CBS News poll
- Uber is helping investigators look into account that sent driver to Ohio home where she was killed
- Verizon Wireless class action settlement deadline is approaching. Here's how to join
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- 2024 NBA playoffs: First-round schedule, times, TV info, key stats, who to watch
- Supreme Court makes it easier to sue for job discrimination over forced transfers
- Confused about the cost of going to college? Join the club.
Recommendation
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Confused about the cost of going to college? Join the club.
Some families left in limbo after Idaho's ban on gender-affirming care for minors allowed to take effect
Cyberattack hits New York state government’s bill drafting office
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
Cyberattack hits New York state government’s bill drafting office
The fluoride fight: Data shows more US cities, towns remove fluoride from drinking water
Breaking Down JoJo Siwa and Lil Tay’s Feud