Current:Home > FinanceMissouri voters pass constitutional amendment requiring increased Kansas City police funding -DataFinance
Missouri voters pass constitutional amendment requiring increased Kansas City police funding
View
Date:2025-04-12 08:38:00
Missouri voters have once again passed a constitutional amendment requiring Kansas City to spend at least a quarter of its budget on police, up from 20% previously.
Tuesday’s vote highlights tension between Republicans in power statewide who are concerned about the possibility of police funding being slashed and leaders of the roughly 28% Black city who say it should be up to them how to spend local tax dollars.
“In Missouri, we defend our police,” Republican state Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer posted on the social platform X on Tuesday. “We don’t defund them.”
Kansas City leaders have vehemently denied any intention of ending the police department.
Kansas City is the only city in Missouri — and one of the largest in the U.S. — that does not have local control of its police department. Instead, a state board oversees the department’s operations, including its budget.
“We consider this to be a major local control issue,” said Gwen Grant, president of the Urban League of Greater Kansas City. “We do not have control of our police department, but we are required to fund it.”
In a statement Wednesday, Mayor Quinton Lucas hinted at a possible rival amendment being introduced “that stands for local control in all of our communities.”
Missouri voters initially approved the increase in Kansas City police funding in 2022, but the state Supreme Court made the rare decision to strike it down over concerns about the cost estimates and ordered it to go before voters again this year.
Voters approved the 2022 measure by 63%. This year, it passed by about 51%.
Fights over control of local police date back more than a century in Missouri.
In 1861, during the Civil War, Confederacy supporter and then-Gov. Claiborne Fox Jackson persuaded the Legislature to pass a law giving the state control over the police department in St. Louis. That statute remained in place until 2013, when voters approved a constitutional amendment returning police to local control.
The state first took over Kansas City police from 1874 until 1932, when the state Supreme Court ruled that the appointed board’s control of the department was unconstitutional.
The state regained control in 1939 at the urging of another segregationist governor, Lloyd Crow Stark, in part because of corruption under highly influential political organizer Tom Pendergast. In 1943, a new law limited the amount a city could be required to appropriate for police to 20% of its general revenue in any fiscal year.
“There are things like this probably in all of our cities and states,” said Lora McDonald, executive director of the Metro Organization for Racial and Economic Equity, or MORE2. “It behooves all of us in this United States to continue to weed out wherever we see that kind of racism in law.”
The latest power struggle over police control started in 2021, when Lucas and other Kansas City leaders unsuccessfully sought to divert a portion of the department’s budget to social service and crime prevention programs. GOP lawmakers in Jefferson City said the effort was a move to “defund” the police in a city with a high rate of violent crime.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Small twin
- Lutherans in Walz’s Minnesota put potlucks before politics during divisive election season
- Postal Service insists it’s ready for a flood of mail-in ballots
- New York officials to release new renderings of possible Gilgo Beach victim
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Henry Winkler and Ron Howard stage 'Happy Days' reunion at Emmys for 50th anniversary
- Caitlin Clark breaks WNBA rookie scoring record, Fever star now at 761 points
- Tell Me Lies’ Grace Van Patten Shares Rare Insight Into Romance With Costar Jackson White
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Research shows most people should take Social Security at 70: Why you may not want to wait
Ranking
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Will the Federal Reserve cut interest rates fast enough to deliver a ‘soft landing’?
- Florida sheriff's deputy airlifted after rollover crash with alleged drunk driver
- Titanic Submersible Passengers’ Harrowing “All Good Here” Text Revealed
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- Henry Winkler and Ron Howard stage 'Happy Days' reunion at Emmys for 50th anniversary
- Postal Service insists it’s ready for a flood of mail-in ballots
- Sustainable investing advocate says ‘anti-woke’ backlash in US won’t stop the movement
Recommendation
Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
'Emily in Paris' to return for Season 5, but Lily Collins says 'there's no place like Rome'
Will same policies yield a different response from campus leaders at the University of California?
Customer fatally shoots teenage Waffle House employee inside North Carolina store
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
The next generation of Buffetts is poised to become one of the biggest forces in philanthropy
Police fatally shoot a person while serving an arrest warrant in Mississippi
Meryl Streep Had the Best Reaction to Being Compared to a Jockstrap at 2024 Emmys