Current:Home > reviewsMaine bars Trump from ballot as US Supreme Court weighs state authority to block former president -DataFinance
Maine bars Trump from ballot as US Supreme Court weighs state authority to block former president
View
Date:2025-04-16 15:15:52
PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Maine’s Democratic secretary of state on Thursday removed former President Donald Trump from the state’s presidential primary ballot under the Constitution’s insurrection clause, becoming the first election official to take action unilaterally as the U.S. Supreme Court is poised to decide whether Trump remains eligible to continue his campaign.
The decision by Secretary of State Shenna Bellows follows a December ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court that booted Trump from the ballot there under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. That decision has been stayed until the U.S. Supreme Court decides whether Trump is barred by the Civil War-era provision, which prohibits those who “engaged in insurrection” from holding office.
The Trump campaign said it would appeal Bellows’ decision to Maine’s state court system, and it is likely that the nation’s highest court will have the final say on whether Trump appears on the ballot there and in the other states.
Bellows found that Trump could no longer run for his prior job because his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol violated Section 3, which bans from office those who “engaged in insurrection.” Bellows made the ruling after some state residents, including a bipartisan group of former lawmakers, challenged Trump’s position on the ballot.
“I do not reach this conclusion lightly,” Bellows wrote in her 34-page decision. “I am mindful that no Secretary of State has ever deprived a presidential candidate of ballot access based on Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. I am also mindful, however, that no presidential candidate has ever before engaged in insurrection.”
The Trump campaign immediately slammed the ruling. “We are witnessing, in real-time, the attempted theft of an election and the disenfranchisement of the American voter,” campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement.
Thursday’s ruling demonstrates the need for the nation’s highest court, which has never ruled on Section 3, to clarify what states can do.
While Maine has just four electoral votes, it’s one of two states to split them. Trump won one of Maine’s electors in 2020, so having him off the ballot there should he emerge as the Republican general election candidate could have outsized implications in a race that is expected to be narrowly decided.
That’s in contrast to Colorado, which Trump lost by 13 percentage points in 2020 and where he wasn’t expected to compete in November if he wins the Republican presidential nomination.
In her decision, Bellows acknowledged that the Supreme Court will probably have the final word but said it was important she did her official duty. That won her praise from a group of prominent Maine voters who filed the petition forcing her to consider the case.
“Secretary Bellows showed great courage in her ruling, and we look forward to helping her defend her judicious and correct decision in court. No elected official is above the law or our constitution, and today’s ruling reaffirms this most important of American principles,” Republican Kimberly Rosen, independent Thomas Saviello and Democrat Ethan Strimling said in a statement.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- In 'Illinoise,' Broadway fans find a show that feels like it 'was written about me'
- San Diego Padres in playoff hunt despite trading superstar Juan Soto: 'Vibes are high'
- CrowdStrike shares details on cause of global tech outage
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- In Northeast Ohio, Hello to Solar and Storage; Goodbye to Coal
- Fewer Americans file for jobless claims as applications remain at elevated, but not troubling levels
- Nashville grapples with lingering neo-Nazi presence in tourist-friendly city
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Prosecutors urge judge not to toss out Trump’s hush money conviction, pushing back on immunity claim
Ranking
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Uvalde school police officer pleads not guilty to charges stemming from actions during 2022 shooting
- Texas city strips funding for monthly art event over drag show
- At-risk adults found abused, neglected at bedbug-infested 'care home', cops say
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- USA Basketball players are not staying at Paris Olympic Village — and that's nothing new
- Man accused of mass shooting attempt at Virginia church ruled competent to stand trial
- Yuval Sharon’s contract as Detroit Opera artistic director extended 3 years through 2027-28 season
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
A man got third-degree burns walking on blazing hot sand dunes in Death Valley, rangers say
Committee studying how to control Wisconsin sandhill cranes
Prisoners fight against working in heat on former slave plantation, raising hope for change in South
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Let Me Spell It Out
Parents' guide to 'Deadpool & Wolverine': Is new Marvel movie appropriate for kids?
UN Secretary-General Says the World Must Turbocharge the Fossil Fuel Phaseout