Current:Home > StocksThe FBI should face new limits on its use of US foreign spy data, a key intelligence board says -DataFinance
The FBI should face new limits on its use of US foreign spy data, a key intelligence board says
View
Date:2025-04-16 19:23:06
WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI should stop using a U.S. spy database of foreigners’ emails and other communications for investigating crimes that aren’t related to national security, a group of White House intelligence advisers recommended in a report released Monday.
The President’s Intelligence Advisory Board’s findings come as the White House pushes Congress to renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act before its expiration at the end of this year. U.S. intelligence officials say Section 702 enables investigations of Chinese and Russian espionage, potential terrorist plots, and other threats.
But spy agencies also end up capturing the communications of U.S. citizens and businesses, and a series of intelligence mistakes at the FBI has fanned bipartisan criticism of the bureau that has strongly colored the debate over renewing the law.
The advisory board says the FBI made “inappropriate use” at times of Section 702 information. Those include queries for a U.S. senator and state senator’s names without properly limiting the search, looking for someone believed to have been at the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection and doing large queries of names of protesters following the 2020 death of George Floyd.
“Unfortunately, complacency, a lack of proper procedures, and the sheer volume of Section 702 activity led to FBI’s inappropriate use of Section 702 authorities, specifically U.S. person queries,” the board said in its report. “U.S. person queries” generally mean searches for U.S. citizens and businesses.
The board recommends the FBI no longer search the data when it is seeking evidence of a crime not related to national security. Currently, the FBI conducts fewer than two dozen such searches a year, a senior administration official told reporters Monday. The official spoke on condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the White House.
The White House has not decided whether it will accept the recommendation but is studying the board’s work and report, the official said.
The board’s report largely lines up with the White House’s positions on other changes being debated in Congress. The board opposed requiring the FBI to obtain a warrant before it searches Section 702 data, saying that change would be impractical. It also says the FBI needs to maintain access to foreign spy collection because unlike other intelligence agencies, it has law enforcement authorities inside the U.S. and can warn Americans that they are being targeted by foreign spies or criminals.
Already, both Republicans and Democrats have called for broader changes affecting the FBI, including a handful of lawmakers in both parties who want to require warrants for any search.
Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., sharply questioned Assistant Attorney General Matt Olsen in June about how it searches Section 702 data and signaled he would push for new protections.
“I don’t think you’ve effectively made the case that there shouldn’t be a warrant requirement, whether or not it is constitutionally required, for a U.S. person search that is crime only,” he said.
Many in the GOP, meanwhile, are furious about the FBI’s investigations of former President Donald Trump and mistakes found by the Justice Department inspector general and other reviewers.
In a statement, the FBI said the report highlighted “how crucial” foreign intelligence was to the bureau’s mission.
“We agree that Section 702 should be reauthorized in a manner that does not diminish its effectiveness, as well as reassures the public of its importance and our ability to adhere rigorously to all relevant rules,” the bureau’s statement said.
veryGood! (58514)
Related
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- A career coach unlocks the secret to acing your job interview and combating anxiety
- 45 Lululemon Finds I Predict Will Sell Out 4th of July Weekend: Don’t Miss These Buys Starting at $9
- After 25 Years of Futility, Democrats Finally Jettison Carbon Pricing in Favor of Incentives to Counter Climate Change
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- Inside Clean Energy: Vote Solar’s Leader Is Stepping Down. Here’s What He and His Group Built
- Amid Punishing Drought, California Is Set to Adopt Rules to Reduce Water Leaks. The Process has Lagged
- New Research Shows Aerosol Emissions May Have Masked Global Warming’s Supercharging of Tropical Storms
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Activists Take Aim at an Expressway Project in Karachi, Saying it Will Only Heighten Climate Threats
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- More states enacting laws to allow younger teens to serve alcohol, report finds
- Prices: What goes up, doesn't always come down
- New Jersey school bus monitor charged with manslaughter after allegedly using phone as disabled girl suffocated
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Dog that walks on hind legs after accident inspires audiences
- Florida Commits $1 Billion to Climate Resilience. But After Hurricane Ian, Some Question the State’s Development Practices
- YouTuber Adam McIntyre Reacts to Evil Colleen Ballinger's Video Addressing Miranda Sings Allegations
Recommendation
The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
What the bonkers bond market means for you
Rural grocery stores are dying. Here's how some small towns are trying to save them
Shawn Johnson East Shares the Kitchen Hacks That Make Her Life Easier as a Busy Mom
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Taylor Swift, Keke Palmer, Austin Butler and More Invited to Join the Oscars’ Prestigious Academy
Billions in USDA Conservation Funding Went to Farmers for Programs that Were Not ‘Climate-Smart,’ a New Study Finds
What the bonkers bond market means for you